Slurs
|
b. 139
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
As in bars 35-36, the tie sustaining F is most probably an erroneous interpretation of the motivic slur of e-f added by Chopin in the proofreading of FE1. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Placement of markings , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions |
|||||||||||||||
|
b. 140
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Placement of markings , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions |
|||||||||||||||
|
b. 145-148
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
At the repetition of bars 41-44 the sources are not free from mistakes and inaccuracies – none of the editions consistently repeated the same interpretation of A. Cf. the note in these bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||||
|
b. 148
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
As in bar 44, EE added an additional slur under the chords in the R.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||||||||
|
b. 153-155
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
Bar 153 is marked in A as repetition of bar 49. However, contrary to that bar, here FE did not complete the slurs in the 1st half of the bar, which has to be considered to be an oversight. GE1 added a slur in the R.H. only, the remaining editions – both. In bar 155 there is no slur in the L.H. in GE1, which is probably an oversight of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place , Inaccuracies in A |
