b. 31
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we give long accents written by Chopin in FEcor. Both signs were clearly distorted in finished FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In CLI and Ap the 7th and 15th semiquavers are written as a1. At the same time, the notation of Ap is faultless, whereas in CLI there is no returning a1 on the 4th beat of the bar. The latter also appears in FEcor, in which Chopin added the , yet only before the last note. It was moved to the correct position only in a later proofreading of FE (→EE2→EE3), which, eventually, displays an entirely correct text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Enharmonic corrections , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
Neither in CLI nor in Ap there are cautionary naturals before the 2nd crotchet in the L.H. Chopin would add signs at different stages of the Etude's publication preparations – before B in the base text for FE, before F in a later proofreading. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the version prepared for printing Chopin decided to shorten the D-d octave in the previous bar and not here. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Chopin's hesitations |
||||||||
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |