|
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we do not consider the accents of Ap, as in the version prepared for printing Chopin avoided overloading the text of the Etude with detailed indications. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||
|
b. 29-34
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we give the detailed fingering given by Chopin in FEcor (→FE→GE,EE). In Ap Chopin marked here a few digits, including one – in bar 33 – different than in the printed version. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
|
b. 29-31
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
We interpret the slur in bar 29 as a continuation of the clearly dragged slur from bar 28. We consider the remaining slurs to be half-bar-long, although in the photocopies available to the editors of mUltimate Chopin, they seem to be shorter. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||||
|
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In CLI and FEcor there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of CLI |
|||||
|
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
We add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
returning e2 on the 8th semiquaver in the bar. The sign was added in a later proofreading of