Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 113

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

GC has the staccato dot in the R,H. only, which may be simply an oversight. On the other hand, the sign in the L.H. was added in GE, based on GC, so it cannot be ruled out that similar revisions were also made in EE and FE. From the point of view of the performer, both manners of notation are equivalent in that context, therefore we adopt the version that is found is most sources.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 113-114

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

 in EE and FE

GC (→GE)

..

The consistent version of EE and FE suggests that longer hairpins visible in GC (→GE) may not reflect the notation of the autograph.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 113

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

Rhythm in EE, GC (→GE1), and a contextual interpretation of FE

..

In FE this bar has 7 quavers as, despite the presence of a quaver rest, all the three octaves are written in crotchets. We think that this error should be corrected by adding quaver flags to the octaves at the beginning of the bar; this leads to the version compliant with EE and GC (→GE1). It is also the version that FE has in analogous bars 31 and 373.
The rhythm of GE2 here is absolutely arbitrary.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions

b. 115

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

Short accent in EE

Long accent in GC (→GE)

No sign in FE

..

The accent in this bar can be found in EE - a short one - and in GC (→GE) – a long one. Actually, when considering the notation of just that single page in GC, one could have doubts as to the length of that accent - our interpretation is based on comparisons with analogous bars. The absence of the accent from FE is probably an error (cf. bar 33).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Errors in FE

b. 116-117

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

Two ties in EE

No ties in GC, GE2 & FE

Tied g in GE1

Our suggestion

..

The version with g sharp1 held and g sharp repeated, i.e. the one probably intended by Chopin (cf. similar bars 34-35 and 376-377) is not to be  found in any of the sources.  The reasons are probably accidental omissions (no ties in GC, GE2 and FE) and revisions (adding a tie sustaining g sharp in GE1 and probably in EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions