Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 131-132

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

f tied in EE & GC (→GE)

No tie in FE

..

Absence of a tie sustaining f sharp in FE is most probably an error. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 132-140

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

In both bars in EE the fifth a sharp-e1 is not separated fromthe entire chord. This may be either a simplified version of the manuscript or the result of its misunderstanding by the engraver. 

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: EE inaccuracies

b. 133-135

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

Tie in EE

No ties in GC (→GE)

2 ties in FE

..

The tie sustaining f sharp1 in bars 133-134 is missing from EE.  #KG (→GE) has neither that tie nor the next one (in bars 134-135). These are definitely errors, as we can see from the presence of relevant ties in analogous bars 141-142 and 149-151.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 134

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

e1 in EE, GC (→GE) & FE2

d1 in FE1

..

The minim d sharp1 that can be seen in FE1 is definitely erroneous, as we can conclude from the presence of e1 appearing consistently in all the remaining sources and the version of the analogous bar 142. The error was corrected in FE2.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 134-135

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

No tie to f in EE

f tied in GC (→GE) & FE

..

The omission to tie the crotchet f sharp in EE is probably an error  – cf. bars 142-143 and 150-151, in which the note is either tied or absent altogether.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE