b. 97-98
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The slur and staccato dot in bar 98 are only found in FE, so perhaps they were added in proofing. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 97
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
There are slight differences between particular sources as regards the scope of the hairpin mark , yet they are probably unintended. We give the version of GC and FE. In GE the mark extends further, reaching the chord in bar 98, and in EE it begins later, under the 2nd crotchet of bar 97. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||
b. 97
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Missing in EE is raising g2 to g sharp2,w which is an obvious error ( before g sharp1 is provided). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||
b. 97-98
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The slurs in GC are written in a careless manner, so the exact moment when the first of them ends (on the 1st or the 2nd beat of the bar) and the other one begins (on the 2nd or the 3rd beat) is not clear. The slur in GE is not divided at all, perhaps due to that ambiguous notation. Our interpretation of GC takes into account the copyist’s evident tendency to draw slurs vigorously, making them longer rather than shorter. In our main text we do not end the slur in bar 97, following EE and FE in that respect. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||
b. 98
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The staccato dot is to be found only in FE. category imprint: Differences between sources |