b. 117-118
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
A missing tie sustaining G sharp in EE and FE is probably an oversight - cf. analogous bars 35-36 and 377-378. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE |
||||||
b. 117
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Only GC (→GE) has the accent mark, which makes it even more difficult to determine the type of accent intended by Chopin. We assume that a long accent was meant here, as was used in analogous bar 35. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||
b. 120
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The minim in the highest voice is not very legible in GC (it was probably corrected from d sharp1 to e1), so in GE it was misread as d sharp1 . category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||
b. 122
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Missing in GC and FE are the naturals cancelling the sharping of e to e sharp before the last crotchet of the bar, which is an obvious error. EE and GE have the correct version, consistent with the analogous bars 40 and 382. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors of GC |
||||||
b. 123
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The authenticity of the hairpin in GC (→GE) is doubtless, yet it is hard to determine what caused the difference between the sources (omission of the mark in one pair of sources or adding it in the other are the two possible options). category imprint: Differences between sources |