mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 555

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

3 ​​​​​​​in FE (→GE,EE)

3 long accents suggested by the editors
..

Three subsequent ​​​​​​​ marks are to be understood as long accents – cf. (short) accents in the previous analogous bars. In the main text, we give them such a form, probably consistent with the notation of [A]. 

category imprint: Interpretations within context

issues: Long accents

b. 555

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In the main text, we add a cautionary ​​​​​​​ before e3. The accidental was added in GE3. 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions

b. 555

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FEH

No teaching fingering
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEH

b. 555-558

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

2 slurs in A (→FE,FC→GE)

No slurs in EE
..

The missing three-note R.H. slurs in b. 555-556 and 557-558 must be a mistake of EE. Generally, EE include a few slurring irregularities in this fragment that are difficult to explain; see also b. 557-560, 561-566.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE

b. 556

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

 in EE

GC and GE2

FE

No markings in GE1
..

In the main text we present the GC and GE2 pedalling, the only sources where these marks are notated without mistakes or inaccuracies. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , EE inaccuracies