|
b. 542-543
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The visible traces of changes prove that two identical Terzverschreibung errors were committed in FE – b1 instead of d2 on the last semiquaver of the 2nd beat of each of those bars. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 543
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE1, the first crotchet is a b1-b2 octave. This patent mistake could have been committed in FE, in which, however, Chopin corrected it in the last phase of proofreading. The mistake in GE1 was corrected already in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 543
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing marking of the top voice is obviously an inaccuracy of notation. In FE, the slur, placed high above that figure, suggests that stems and beam were planned here, but were overlooked by the engraver, perhaps due to the need to correct an erroneous note (one can see traces of removal of d3 at the beginning of the 3rd beat of the bar). The top voice was completed in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 543-544
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the majority of the editions, the ending of the slur is inaccurate – in all remaining analogous figures, the slurs reach the crotchet that ends the move. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 543-544
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
When interpreted literally, the slur of FC goes under the rest and ends on the treble clef at the end of b. 543. It misled the engraver of GE1; he assumed that the slur was supposed to reach the octave in b. 544. The nonsensical slur was removed in GE2 (in FC and GE1 there are no slurs in the previous bars) and restored, already in its correct form, in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC |
