|
b. 377-378
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
As in bars 194-195, GE (→FE,EE,IE) convey a simplified and inaccurate picture of the A dynamic markings. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 378
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we leave the notation of A, without the slur in the L.H. The slur of GE (→FE→EE), perhaps added by Chopin in the proofreading of GE1 and compliant with the authentic slur in analogous bar 34, can also be considered to be compatible with Chopin's intention. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||
|
b. 378
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The mistake of FE is proved by the orchestral part, in which there is a B in cellos and double-basses, as well as by the Chopinesque correction in FED. The correct text was introduced in GE probably on the basis of comparison of the piano part with the orchestral parts. EE3 was revised probably on the basis of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , GE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
|
b. 378
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The accent mark in FE is slightly but distinctly longer than the short accents in the previous bars. However, the remaining editions found this difference negligible. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||
|
b. 378
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FEH, the tied g1 quaver is slashed. It is most probably an additional signal reminding that the note should not be played. category imprint: Source & stylistic information |
& cresc. in 
