|
b. 381
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
We include the fingering of FEH in the main text, written probably by Chopin and confirmed by the Chopinesque entry in FED. In EE, Fontana gives the same fingering. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||||
|
b. 382
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Both fingerings could be coming from Chopin, yet their possible authenticity is unconfirmed. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||||
|
b. 382
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the R.H. part, FE has only two naturals in the first semiquaver triplet. This inaccuracy, typical of Chopin, was corrected in the remaining editions – GE1 (→GE2) added a category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
|||||||||||
|
b. 382-383
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The interpretation of the phrase mark of A by FE (→EE) must be considered inaccurate: the phrase mark of the manuscript is pulled to the beginning of b. 383, while the bold ending of the slur proves a careful, diligent stroke of the pen. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 382-383
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing slur for the L.H. is most probably an oversight of the engraver of FE. After all, it cannot be excluded that, looking at A, he regarded the L.H. slur as the beginning of the R.H. slur, which can be indicated by the original range of the R.H. slur in FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
before the penultimate semiquaver of the bar, while 
