|
b. 648
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, the placement of the category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Placement of markings , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||||
|
b. 648-649
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the manuscripts these bars are marked as repetition of b. 197-198. In spite of that, FE (→EE) reproduced the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 648-657
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the pedalling entered by Chopin into FC (→GE) in b. 197-206 and valid also here due to the abridged notation of the discussed bars. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
|
b. 649
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In EE the octave in LH is written in short with a digit 8. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Abbreviated octaves' notation |
|||||||||||
|
b. 649
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The authentic notation may not have included a separate fermata below LH, as it does not appear neither in GC nor in FE. The lower fermata in GE must be a revision, so it must have also been added in EE. Both notations are equivalent but to be precie and formal we supplement the fermata in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
in 
combination, yet both indications would be then written next to each other and on the same level. In this case, the accent was supposedly to concern both parts and not the L.H. only, which is suggested by the notation of 
