mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 379

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

 in A (→GE→FE,IE)

 in EE
..

It is uncertain whether the change of  to  is a mistake or a revision by EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , fz – f

b. 379

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

in A

No marking in GE (→FE,EE,IE)
..

The absence of  in GE (→FE,EE,IE) is most probably an oversight by the engraver.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 379

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

Indication below lower staff in A

Indication above upper staff in GE (→FE,EE,IE)
..

In the main text we keep the position of the sempre ben marcato indication under the L.H. part, as it is in A, although it is difficult to assume that it concerns L.H. only. On the other hand, if Chopin had wanted to put it over the R.H. part, as it was reproduced in GE (→FE,EE,IE), he could have easily done it, which means that he carefully thought out the position of the indication.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 379-381

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

No fingering in A (→GE→FE,IE)

Fingering in EE
..

In the main text, we do not include the inauthentic fingering added by EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 380

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No mark in GE
..

The lack of staccato dot over e in the L.H. is most probably an oversight of the engraver.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE