|
b. 376
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In the main text, we do not include the inauthentic fingering added by EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 377
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The short accent in EE, given the lack of a note to be accented, must an inaccuracy of notation as there is a long accent here in both GC and FE. Lack of accent in GE must be an element of revision based on an assumption that in GC the tie on g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 377-378
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Given the apparently inaccurate notation of sources we suggest a slur based on a corresponding phrasing in bars 117-118. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||
|
b. 377-378
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
Extending the range of the hairpin almost throughout the two bars is an arbitrary revision of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 377
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
According to us, there is a strong likelihood that the version of the sources is erroneous. It is indicated by the dotted rhythm in the analogous phrase in bar 373 as well as in bars 381, 383 and 385. The analysis of the sources of the orchestral part also suggests a mistake in the notation of the rhythm of the L.H. part – see e.g. MFrorch. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Dotted or even rhythm |
