|
b. 379-380
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
It is difficult to assume that the slurs in the L.H. appearing in GE1 (→FE) could have been added in this form by Chopin – they are contrary to the authentic slur in the R.H., whereas their range overlaps with the beams of the group of quavers. Therefore, it is most probably a revision, which also questions the authenticity of the slurs added in GE1 in the previous two bars. The revisers of EE and GE2 replaced them with a two-bar slur modelled after the slur of the R.H.; it specifies the notation, yet it does not follow from the notation of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 379-380
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The slur in EE was most probably added after the slur featured in the analogous situation four bars earlier. It would be justified if it were not for the fact that the slur in bars 375-376 could be inaccurate. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 379
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we include these 5 digits from the fingering written in FEH that could have been written by Chopin (the 6th digit is written by a foreign hand). category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||
|
b. 379
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||
|
b. 379
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we omit the category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
before the 4th semiquaver (d2), unnecessarily repeated in 
-c