|
b. 443-444
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
According to us, the slur of FE (→EE), additionally separating a group of two notes from a three-note motif, is a result of an erroneous interpretation of the tie of a category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 443
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The addition introduced in GE, although most probably arbitrary (cf. bar 454), is justified here – it is present in all sources in analogous bar 199. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 443-444
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Instead of a continuous slur for the bass motif, in EE there are two slurs converging on the dotted e minim. It is an inaccuracy, with no actual implications on the performance, which probably results from the fact that in FE b. 444 opens a new line of the text, and the slur in that bar, although it begins before the note, does not suggest continuation with its shape. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
|
b. 444
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Before the highest note of the chord in GC and FE there's no category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||||
|
b. 444
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In this context, the missing staccato marks must be considered an oversight of Chopin or of the engraver of FE. Wedges were added both in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
1, contextual interpretation of 
lowering c
3 to c3, which obviously is an omission.
