mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 441

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fontana's fingering in EE
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 442

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

In EE minims are not notted.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: Errors in EE

b. 442-443

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Quavers in sources

Pairs of notes suggested by the editors
..

As in the case of bars 419-423, we unify the notation of these bars after the vast majority of analogous figures.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Omitted correction of an analogous place

b. 442

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In the sources, the c​​​​​​​2 note is wrongly assigned to the L.H. The mistake can be understood if we take into account the fact that on the last beat of bar 441 and the 1st quaver in bar 442 the parts of both hands are written together, on the top stave. In Chopin's autographs, division into voices may be unclear, e.g. due to middle notes written without stems. 

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

b. 442-443

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

 in FE (→EE)

No sign in GE
..

The missing ​​​​​​​ hairpin in GE may result from a mistake of the engraver or, which seems to be more likely in this case, from the fact that the mark was added in the last phase of proofreading of FE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE