b. 441-445
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The omission of the dashes marking the range of crescendo is probably an inaccuracy of FE (→EE), although it cannot be excluded that it was in GE1 that they were initially omitted, to be added in the last phase of proofreading. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 441
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there is no raising c2 to c2. Visible traces of corrections in print reveal that it was a1 that was the original version; it was moved to the correct pitch in the proofreading, yet without . This patent oversight (of the engraver or of Chopin at the time of marking the correction) was revised both in GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Errors resulting from corrections , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 441-442
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest slurs from the beginning of bar 442 in both hands due to the consistent slurring of the analogous phrases in bars 416-424. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 441
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In the main text, we add a cautionary next to d3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals , Omission of current key accidentals |
||||||||
b. 441-443
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Both sources containing fingering define the same scheme that was already indicated the first time similar figures appeared (bars 416-417). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH |