|
b. 277
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Tenuto slurs |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 277-279
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The trills in b. 277 and 279 are written down in GE without a wavy line after the category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 277
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
Neither AsI nor A (→GE→FE1,EE,FESB) include an accidental to the 7th semiquaver. The F major chord underlying this place is, however, thanks to the C7 chords present directly both before and after it, temporarily the tonic, which requires the use of e2, and not e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 277-283
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
Unlike the first time (bars 110-116), in this case in A Chopin provided with staccato dots also the initial L.H. octaves in bar 279, 281 and 283. In this situation we consider the missing dot in bar 277 to be an oversight, and in the main text we provide dots in all four places. A similar addition was introduced already by GE. By contrast, in EE2, which repeated many marks overlooked in FE (→EE1) after GE1, only the dots in bar 277 and 279 were added. See also the note on the L.H. slurs. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 277
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In A the long accent is placed over the R.H. chord, which, however, certainly does not mean that it concerns the R.H. part only. Therefore, in the main text we move it between the staves, in accordance with the Chopinesque notation of analogous bar 110. The reviser of EE was most probably motivated by a similar idea when adding another accent under the L.H. part. The use of a short accent in FE (→EE) is an inaccuracy, frequent in Chopinesque editions. The absence of the mark in GE1 must be a mistake by the engraver, rectified in GE2 after A. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
in 
in 
2. This conclusion is also supported by bar 285 – in the orchestral version of this phrase all sources contain e2(3). The mistake, patent in this context, was, however, corrected only in the stage of proofreading 
