



b. 276-277
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In the main text, we do not include the inauthentic R.H. fingering added by EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||||||
b. 277-278
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The GC (→GE1) version, although harmonically and pianistically quite possible, is probably erroneous. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error , Errors of GC |
|||||||||||||
b. 277-278
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Lack of the cresc. indication in EE is most probably an error (see the note to bar 275). Lack of the dashes delimiting the cresc. scope in GE is an error beyond any doubt. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||||||||||
b. 277-280
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
The accents written by Chopin in FEG raise doubts as to the type of the used accent and placement with respect to the bottom and upper stave. In the main text we present the most plausible interpretation of the signs written by Chopin in FEG, according to us. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Authentic corrections of GE , Authentic corrections of EE |
|||||||||||||
b. 277-278
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
In the main text we adhere to the dynamic markings written by Chopin in FEG (→GE). In the remaining two first editions cresc. is preceded with a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of GE , Authentic corrections of EE |