



b. 275-276
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The articulation markings in these bars are questionable. We consider the dot over the last b1 in bar 275 to be a patent mistake – attenuating the energy contained in this characteristic, octave gesture opening the theme seems to be inconceivable. However, it is unclear whether and which note the dot was supposed to apply to – the potential candidates are the previous quaver (b category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 275
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we add cautionary naturals to the D-d octave. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 275-283
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we keep the notation of A, in which Chopin precisely and consistently differentiated between the types of staccato markings in the L.H., saving wedges for the bass notes only. This subtlety was not preserved by GE (→FE,EE), in which all markings were reproduced as wedges. See also bar 276 and 279. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Wedges |
||||||
b. 275-276
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The longer FE slur (→EE) could be the initial version, which seems to be evidenced by a deletion that can be seen in A in the place where the slur's ending at the beginning of bar 276 should be expected. It is not entirely certain whether it was a slur that was deleted, while the slur at the end of bar 275 in A does not suggest that it should be continued. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A |
||||||
b. 275
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In A there is no accidental to the 2nd R.H. crotchet. The inaccuracy was removed in GE (→FE,EE,IE) by adding a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |