



b. 278-279
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slurs of GE (→FE→EE) could have been added by Chopin; however, according to us, it is highly unlikely due to their schematic range, whose relationship with the figuration's structure is largely unconvincing. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 278
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, omission of the additional quaver stem next to f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 278-280
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The omission of the last accent in bar 280 in GE1 must be a mistake. The accent was added in FE, yet it was placed inaccurately, as a result of which it is uncertain whether it applies to the 2nd or the 1st quaver of the triplet (the 1st accent in bar 278 in FE is even more inaccurate; we interpret it to apply to the 1st quaver in the bar). In EE, three out of four accents were put a quaver earlier, on the 1st or 7th note in the bar, which is a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 278-279
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The digits in FEH are not written by Chopin's hand, hence it is uncertain whether they come from a lesson with Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
b. 278-279
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In both bars, FE (→EE,GE1→GE2) feature a cautionary (?) category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Last key signature sign |