Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 275

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

In GE1 (→FEEE) a  was overlooked, in A raising b1 to b1. The mistake was corrected in GE2.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 275

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

  in FE, literal reading

 in GE

 in EE

..

When interpreted literally, the  mark in FE falls on a rest. This inaccuracy is most probably a result of a too literal reproduction of the notation of [A], in which Chopin could have not had enough space to write the mark between the bottom stave and the semiquaver. In the main text, we assume, in accordance with GE and EE, that the mark concerns the beginning of the 2nd beat of the bar. The absence of  in GE is most probably an oversight.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE

b. 275

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Staccato dot in FE (→EE,GE1GE2)

No mark in GE3

..

The missing dot must be an oversight of GE3 – in the previous GE, the dot is hardly noticeable within the 'P' letter in the  mark.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 275

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No indication in FE (→EE,GE1GE2)

a tempo in GE3

..

The a tempo indication added in GE3, in spite of its evident accuracy, certainly does not come from Chopin. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 275

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No mark in sources

Staccato dot suggested by the editors

..

In the main text, we add a staccato dot also for the chord in the L.H. Such an articulation is unquestionable; in similar contexts, Chopin would often consider marks over the R.H. to be valid also in the L.H.

category imprint: Editorial revisions