



b. 275
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 275
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
When interpreted literally, the category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE |
||||||||||
b. 275
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing dot must be an oversight of GE3 – in the previous GE, the dot is hardly noticeable within the 'P' letter in the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||||
b. 275
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The a tempo indication added in GE3, in spite of its evident accuracy, certainly does not come from Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 275
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we add a staccato dot also for the chord in the L.H. Such an articulation is unquestionable; in similar contexts, Chopin would often consider marks over the R.H. to be valid also in the L.H. category imprint: Editorial revisions |