b. 328
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The first finger indicated for the d bass quaver seems to be highly questionable, since it would be the only known example of such an unnatural fingering having been written down. The use of the 5th finger of the L.H. for the bottommost note was considered obvious and rarely marked. In particular situations, Chopin instructed his pupils to perform even a few subsequent notes with the 5th finger – see the Nocturne in C Minor, Op. 27 No. 1, bars 13-14 or the Sonata in B Minor, Op. 35, 3rd mov., bar 31. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 328-331
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we interpret four marks in these bars as long accents. Thus, we demonstrate the difference in indications with respect to analogous bars 100-103, in which similar marks are clearly longer and separated with repeated indications. After all, it is highly likely that different lengths of marks in [A] were not so regular or meaningful, since the Chopinesque hairpin, unless preceded with a mark, generally also indicates an accent. According to us, Chopin most probably meant both fragments to be performed in the same manner. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents |
|||||
b. 328-331
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Like in analogous bars 100-103, staccato dots are an arbitrary addition of the revision of GE3. That addition formed a part of a more comprehensive package of editorial measures encompassing performance indications of that Tutti (e.g. staccato dots were added over the repeated g1 semiquavers in bar 333). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 328
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
b. 328
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In FE1 (→FE2) there are no ledger lines on the 2nd semiquaver of the 5th and 6th R.H. triplets. The noteheads are actually at the right pitch, yet the notation is misleading, particularly in the case of a2, which can be easily mistaken for a g2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |