|
b. 320
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
We suggest an accent in the main text, as in the preceding bar. The mark was added in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 320
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The versions of GE and FE can be considered equal variants, since each of them may be authentic; moreover, it seems impossible to determine their chronology. In the main text we give the version of FE, our principal source. The version of EE1 is most probably a mistake of the engraver, revised in EE2 (→EE3). category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 320-321
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Both versions may be authentic, yet each may also inaccurately convey the notation of the manuscript. Engravers would eagerly adjust slurs to rhythmic values or beams (e.g. this is how the slur of FE was shortened in EE here), which makes us approach the notation of GE with caution. On the other hand, the engraver of FE could have, e.g. swapped the slurs in this and the next bar – see b. 321-322. Out of these equal variants, to the main text we choose the version of the principal source, i.e. FE. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 320
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 320
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |
in 
to E. In the next two bars the sources contain respective accidentals.