Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 263-264

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

Pedalling in GC (literal reading) & GE2

Pedalling in GC (possible interpretation→GE1)

Another interpretation of GC suggested by the editors

Pedalling in FE (→EE)

..

It is not certain who interpreted Chopin's intention in [A] more accurately – the copyist in GC (→GE) or the engraver of FE (→EE). According to us, an earlier change of pedal in FE seems to be less likely. The notation of GC may be interpreted in three ways, out of which the literal interpretation, adopted in GE2, is dubious from the pianistic point of view. The remaining two – given in GE1 and our main text – are natural from the pianistic point of view and can be considered to be equal. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccuracies in GC

b. 263-264

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

No dashes in sources

Dashes suggested by the editors

..

In the main text we suggest extending the dashes marking the range of cresc. until  in bar 264, in accordance with the musical sense.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 263-264

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

In A the second halves of these bars are written in an abbreviated manner as minims with a quaver tremolo. In GE1 and subsequent editions, the quavers were written without abbreviations.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: GE revisions

b. 263

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

..

FE has an erroneous e as the 2nd quaver.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error

b. 263-265

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Slurs in FE (→EE)

Slurs in GE1 (→GE2)

Slurs in GE3

Slurs in FED

Slurs suggested by the editors

..

In the main text, we include the correction of the phrasing written by Chopin in FED, which we consider rather a proofreading of the erroneously interpreted slur of [A] than a change of the slurring's concept. At the same time, we interpret the fact of the slurs coinciding at the beginning of bar 264, which could also reproduce the notation of [A] inaccurately, as a continuous slur, like it was written in the first element of the progression (bars 239-240). Both in GE1 (→GE2) and GE3, the shorter slur over bar 263 seems to be an inaccuracy.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Inaccuracies in GE