|
b. 250-252
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The slurs added in GE3 – after the authentic slurs of the L.H. – most probably correspond to a performance envisioned by Chopin. However, we do not add them in the main text, since division into particular figures results here from the very shape of motifs, emphasised by beams. Similar slurs were introduced in GE3 also in bars 256-257. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||||||||
|
b. 250-256
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Despite significant differences in the length of the marks in b. 250, 252, 254 & 256 visible in A, we consider all of them to be accents. The mark in b. 250 in itself could be regarded as a long accent; however, in the context of two subsequent ones, we interpret it as a short accent. Due to the reasons discussed in analogous b. 118-124, in the main text we give a notation unified with four short accents; such a solution was also applied in GE2 (→GE3). The two missing marks in FC (→GE1) are most probably an oversight, while the changes introduced in EE, with differentiated accents for both hands and vertical accents, the latter being typical of that edition – a revision. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||||
|
b. 250
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||||||||
|
b. 250-251
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Chopin could have entered here fingerings into [A] after Fontana had finished [FC]. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||||||
|
b. 250-260
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Separate L.H. slurs in b. 250-252 and 258-260 are an arbitrary revision of GE2. One reason for this might be the changes to the original layout performed in that edition, in particular moving the R.H. part fragments written down by Chopin on the bottom stave together with the L.H. part to the top stave. Due to the separation of the parts of both hands, it becomes less intuitive that the slur over the R.H. part applies to both hands (we do not reproduce the layout of GE2 in our transcriptions). category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions |
in 
before e
2. The accidental was also added in 
