b. 300
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we suggest adding a slur after the two preceding bars of an analogous structure. Chopin either forgot to mark this bar (cf. the previous note) or considered that the previous bars were enough (as a performance pattern). category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||
b. 300
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
Both bass notes are certainly to be played tenuto, as in the previous bars. The missing slur could be understood as an indication that the articulation should be other than legato; however, the tenuto markings are of a reminding nature: they indicate that the rhythmic value should be held to the end, which results from the context though – separating these notes as an independent voice written in long rhythmic values would be pointless if they were not to be held in full. Due to the above, we refrain from burdening the main text with indications that do not carry new information. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||
b. 301
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we suggest adding a sign after bars 303 and 305 – cf. analogous bars 151-155. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||
b. 301
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||
b. 301
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |