b. 389-390
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
b. 389
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE (→EE,GE1→GE2), the 2nd half of the bar is written with the help of octave sign; at the same time, FE (→GE1→GE2) does not contain a single accidental therein. EE tried to correct the inaccuracy by adding sharps before e3 and a2 and a before d3. GE3 has the same notation we adopted in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 390
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In FE on the last crotchet in this bar there are seventh H1-A and seventh h-a1. This is an obvious error as the note heads of bottom notes are notated at the right pitch, only there are no ledger lines marked for them. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||||
b. 390
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The version of FE with a tenth chord is certainly erroneous. The mistake was corrected in EE, most probably on the basis of comparison with analogous bar 46. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error |
|||||||||||
b. 390
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, the missing after the mark in bar 389 is most probably an oversight (of Chopin or of the engraver), since there are no reasons for the notation to deviate from the remaining, similar fragments. The mark was added already in GE and EE. See also bars 394-395. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , No pedal release mark |