|
b. 248
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The wedge written in the part of the R.H. in A was reproduced in GE (→FE→EE) as a dot and another one was added in the L.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |
|||||
|
b. 248
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
A later beginning of the slur in GE1 is an evident inaccuracy (the engraver made his work easier by avoiding an atypical slur). A slur compliant with the course of music was introduced both in FE (→EE) and GE2. The correction in FE could have been ordered by Chopin, but it remains uncertain. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
|
b. 248-249
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Taking into account the erroneous beginning and end of the slur of GE1, it is difficult to assume that Chopin controlled this place. Therefore, in the main text we give the most likely interpretation of the slurs of A – due to the change of the page (from bar 249), the separation of the slurs can be questioned; however, according to us, neither the slur in bar 248 nor the one in bar 249 suggest an intention to combine them. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||||
|
b. 248
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Shorter rhythmic values certainly stem from Chopin's proofreading in FE (→EE). The aim was most probably to differentiate the performance of bars 248 and 252 in a more distinct manner due to the harmonically different continuation in bars 249 and 253. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
|
b. 248-251
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
1 in 
