|
b. 298
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
|
b. 298
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The fingering digit, written in FED between the staves, could also refer to d category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 298
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The traces of proofreading in print, visible in FE, allow us to state that the penultimate semiquaver was initially a b1. It was most probably the original version, since it seems to be highly unlikely that the note could have been printed by mistake. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 298
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In some of the editions, the whole-bar rest was specified with the digit 1 – over each of the staves in GE1 and EE, between the staves in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 298
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Like in analogous b. 65, in the main text we suggest adding pedal markings on the 1st beat of the bar after a comparison with b. 39, which is basically identical. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
1 in the R.H., which is, however, much less likely from the pianistic point of view.
