



b. 247
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In EE the 3rd R.H. quaver is preceded by a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||||||||||||||
b. 248
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In GE1 there is no category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||||||||||||
b. 248-249
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
In FE1 the crescendo indication was placed – most probably after the proofreading entry of Chopin – already in bar 238. In the main text we adopt the version of FEG (→GE) and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of GE , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||||||||||||||||
b. 248-249
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
In the main text, we give the fingering written in pencil to FES (with one added digit for more clarity), coming most probably from Chopin. A different fingering, probably coming from Chopin, is in FESf. The poorly legible annotation in FEO may be interpreted in a variety of ways – we suggest these interpretations that lead to a pianistically natural fingering as variants. The fingering in EE comes from the editor and it is inauthentic. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEO , Annotations in FESf |
||||||||||||||||||||
b. 248
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |