mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 246-247

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

f2 repeated in FE (→GE,EE)

f2 tied suggested by the editors
..

The missing tie of f2 in FE (→GE,EE) is most probably an oversight – cf. analogous bars 92-93, 94-95 and 244-245.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

b. 246

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

..

In the main text, we add a cautionary ​​​​​​​ before a1, after the authentic accidental featured 2 bars earlier.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Cautionary accidentals

b. 246

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No sign in FE (→GE,EE)

[] suggested by the editors
..

In the main text, we suggest adding a ​​​​​​​ mark after analogous bar 244.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions

b. 246-249

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

No markings in A

 &  in FC

in GE1

in bar 246 in FE (→EE)

 & - - -  in GE2 (→GE3)

 & - - - , our alternative suggestion
..

Chopin added  in b. 246 in the proofreading of FE, thus confirming such a position of the indication: see the note to analogous b. 114-117. On the other hand, the marks written by Chopin in FC are also consistent, and in the case of  in b. 249, visibly supported by a critical look at the final result of additions: Chopin crossed out the previously written  there. In the main text we give the indications of FC, which are a part of a numerous set of indications encompassing the entire theme, which ends here. As an alternative solution we also suggest, next to the version of FE, adding dashes leading cresc. to  in b. 249 in FC, as written by Chopin in analogous b. 109-116. The missing  indication may be a mistake of GE1, whereas the version of GE2 (→GE3) was entirely repeated after FC in b. 114-117 (cf. b. 235-238).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of FC

b. 246-249

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Slur in A (→FC→GE1, →FE→EE) and GE3

Shorter slur in GE2
..

The shorter slur in GE2 is most probably a mistake by the engraver. It was corrected in GE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions