|
b. 374
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The fact that there is no indication that f category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 374
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we suggest pedal marks modelled on an authentic indication in analogous bar 372. This bar opens the last page in A, which is devoid of pedal marks, which makes us assume that Chopin forgot to write them there. However, it cannot be ruled out that he did not repeat the marks on purpose due to a lower register of the bass and the R.H. part. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 375-398
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GC bars 375-432 are notated in an abbreviated form. Instead of notes there are digits written out corresponding to numbered bars 33-90. In b. 375, as an example, G category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
||||||||
|
b. 375
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Lack of the ten. marking in FE may result from misinterpretation of the beginning of an abbreviated notation in [A2] (it is most probable that Chopin used the same abbreviation as in [A1]). In a corresponding b. 33 the marking is found FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 375
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
We believe that both the short accent in EE and hairoin in GE result from misunderstanding of the base text notation. In the main text we present a long accent based on GC and FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
should be taken over by the L.H. is to be considered an inaccuracy of notation. Chopin could have considered the indication in very similar 
1-G
in