b. 372
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The difference in the length of the accents in FE seems to be accidental – in bar 375, accents in a similar motif are all the same. Due to this reason, in the main text we give accents of the same length (short), just like in GE and EE. category imprint: issues: Long accents |
|||||||||||
b. 372-373
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
According to us, the varying ranges of the slurs in bars 373 and 377 may result from misunderstanding of the manner of encompassing the full rhythmic value of the last note with a slur ('slurs-tenuto'), used by Chopin on a number of occasions. The slurs visible in FE would be two attempts to adjust such slurs to the notes in the top voice. In the main text, we suggest reconstruction of such a notation in both bars. The slurs were unified also in GE3, which considered the version of bar 373 to be inaccurate. It can be regarded as an alternative attempt to interpret the slurs of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Tenuto slurs |
|||||||||||
b. 372-373
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we include the digits written in FEH that, according to us, could have been written by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
b. 372
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
b. 372
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
We add a cautionary before c4 in the main text. category imprint: Editorial revisions |