



b. 232-234
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
Before the top note of the last octave in bar 232 and the 2nd one in bar 234, there are no accidentals in GC and the earlier FE. The necessary signs – category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||
b. 232
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In GC and FE1 (→FE2→FE3) there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||
b. 232
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
The version of GE must be erroneous – cf. analogous bar 120. The mistake was probably also in FE, where, however, it was corrected – perhaps by Chopin – in the last phase of proofreading. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 232
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In all sources, there is a repeated category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |
|||||
b. 232
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest adding a slur on the basis of a comparison with the recapitulation (bar 583). The slur was added already in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |