b. 328
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
b. 328
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In FE1 (→FE2) there are no ledger lines on the 2nd semiquaver of the 5th and 6th R.H. triplets. The noteheads are actually at the right pitch, yet the notation is misleading, particularly in the case of a2, which can be easily mistaken for a g2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
b. 328
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As was the case with the 5th triplet in bar 325, here the 3rd triplet is presented in AsI in its initial form. In both places Chopin eventually opted for a more regular form of the figuration. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Main-line changes |
||||||||
b. 329
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
There is no before the 3rd third in A (→GE→FE→EE1→EE2). Chopin's oversight is proved by a present both in the cello part in Morch and analogous bar 5. The sign was added in EE3, probably on the basis of the indicated analogy. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors of A |
||||||||
b. 329
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, the indication is to be interpreted as valid already from the beginning of the bar. It is one of examples of the manner of introducing indications within the scope of their validity, used sometimes by Chopin, particularly in his earlier works. In GE (→FE→EE) was most probably linked with the entrance of the L.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Centrally placed marks , Inaccuracies in A |