|
b. 230
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The slurring over bars 229-230 is equivocal in the sources – the slur in bar 229 (at the end of staff) points to the continuation but in bar 230 a new slur begins. Comparison with the analogous bars 369-370 shows that Chopin almost certainly intended a continuous slur. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Uncertain slur continuation , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 230
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
We consider the version of FE (→GE1→GE2) to be erroneous due to the reasons mentioned in a very similar situation in bar 225. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 230
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The version of GE most probably resulted from an oversight of the engraver of GE1 – cf. analogous bar 249. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 230
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we add wedges to the quavers at the beginning of the bar, since their absence in FE (→GE) can be easily explained by an oversight related to the transition into a new line of text. The virtuoso character of the figuration and a clear analogy between the progression's segments in bars 228-230 make the articulation of those quavers clear. The mark in the R.H. was added in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 230-231
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |
1 in 
