mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 331

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

  in A

No signs in GE (→FE,EE)
..

The missing dynamic hairpins under the L.H. part are almost certainly a mistake by the engraver of GE1. It is difficult to determine the exact range of the marks in A, since their arms are of different length.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in A

b. 331

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

..

In GE (→FE,EE) the e1 crotchet is provided with two augmentation dots, which could have been caused by the spot in A, resembling a second dot. It must be a mistake, since this e1 note is continued by the d1 quaver, falling on the 4th quaver in the bar. In FESB this note was placed on one stem with the g1 quaver, which changed its value to a double dotted quaver. It was probably an attempt at correcting the excessive rhythmic value of this note.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Different values of chord components , Errors in GE , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE

b. 332

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

Slur in A & GE2

No slur in GE1 (→FE→EE)
..

The missing slur in GE1 (→FE→EE) must be an oversight of the engraver, corrected in GE2.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 332-335

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

c​​​​​​​1 tied in FE (→EE)

c​​​​​​​1 repeated in GE
..

The ties of c​​​​​​​1 in bars 332-333 and 334-335 were most probably added by Chopin in the last phase of proofreading of FE (→EE). In bar 335, it is the sustained c​​​​​​​1 that was crossed out in FEH, which is most probably just a

category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Authentic corrections of FE , Annotations in FEH

b. 332

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Inverted long accent in A

Long accent in FC

in FE (→EE)

Short accent in GE
..

In the main text we give a long accent with which Chopin replaced in FC the original reversed accent, inaccurately reproduced as a  hairpin both in FC and FE (→EE). The short accent in GE is a typical inaccuracy related to Chopinesque long accents, which do not belong to the canon of generally applied indications.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Long accents , Authentic corrections of FC