|
b. 213
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||
|
b. 213
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The Viol. indication, added in GE1, may be authentic. Chopin could have had two reasons to specify the instrumentation: the reduction does not include here an important motif of the flute and oboe; moreover, in GE1 the dots and the slur written in A were overlooked. The possibility that the articulation markings were deliberately replaced with this indication seems to be much less likely. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||
|
b. 213-214
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
|
b. 213
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 213-214
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The earlier beginning of the slur in GE1 (→FE→EE) has no musical justification and is an example of the schematic approach to slurs of the engraver of GE1. The simultaneous oversight of the staccato dot at the beginning of bar 213 in this edition probably contributed to the fact that the erroneous range of this slur was not detected in later editions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
is probably an oversight of the engraver of 
