



b. 212
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing accent in GE is probably an oversight of the engraver of GE1, although the mark could have also been added only just in the last proofreading of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 212-213
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The fingering of FED in bar 216 expands upon the indication from bar 212; hence, in the main text we give it together already for the first time. Similarly, the digit written in FEH in bar 213 complements the indications from bar 212. The fingerings in those copies differ in the first digit only; however, it may mark a different fingering of the entire sequence of semiquavers, since the digits in FED may be ascribed both to the left and right hand. In the former, the continuation would be the same as in FEH, while in the final part, perhaps the same as in EE. In the latter, the continuation (with the L.H.) could be completely different – category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Annotations in FED , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 212
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 212-213
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of the category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 212
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
In FE the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions |