mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 213-215

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I

..

In the main text we add cautionary flats to a1-a2 in bar 213 and to a2-a3 in bar 215.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 213

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I

..

In A the  raising f1 to f1 is missing. Chopin's mistake, patent in this context, was rectified by GE (→FE,EE,IE).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A

b. 214

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FED

No teaching fingering
 
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED

b. 214-215

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

No slurs in A

3 slurs in GE1 (→FE→EE)

Slur in GE2
..

It is difficult to imagine that Chopin, when proofreading GE1, could have added slurs in the L.H. in this form: the added slur, analogous with the slur in the R.H. (cf. the slur in GE2), was either reproduced in a simplified manner (GE1 avoided long slurs, requiring a precise adjustment) or it is simply an editorial revision. Since in such a context the slur over the R.H. is valid also for the L.H., in the main text we leave the notation of A.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 214

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Accent in A & GE2

No mark in GE1 (→FE→EE)
..

The missing accent in GE1 (→FE→EE) is certainly an oversight.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions