b. 294
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we add cautionary flats before e2 and a. In turn, we omit the unjustified before d1 present in the sources. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 294
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The wedge over d1 is very clear in A, although it was placed atypically due to the deletion over the stave – next to the crotchet stem. Therefore, reproducing it as a dot is most probably an inaccuracy. In turn, the status of the dot in the L.H. is unclear – theoretically, it could have been added by Chopin, yet taking into account the deletions of the signs referring to the L.H. visible in A in bars 294, 296 and 298, we consider it to be an editorial revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 294
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The sources include a cautionary before d1 at the beginning of the bar. In FE (→EE) and GE2 a respective sign was added also next to d in the L.H. We do not include these signs in the main text, since it is d that has been exclusively present for more than 20 bars and not d. Cf. bar 298. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , FE revisions , Last key signature sign |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 294
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Fingering in FED presumably contains an error – the 1st finger on E would lead to a fingering fundamentally different from the one Chopin gave in previous bars. In the main text, we give the fingering in FEFo, consistent with other entries in the pupils' copies (taking into account only the '4' in FED), EE and, first of all. with the previous printed Chopinesque indications. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FEH , Annotations in FEFo |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 294-295
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we correct the minor inaccuracy of the notation of the rhythm in FE (→EE). The missing dot prolonging the e1 quaver in bar 294 could have also contributed to the omission of the tie of that note in GE, although, according to us, it is more likely that the tie was added by Chopin in the last stage of proofreading of FE. The crossing-out of the e1 quaver at the beginning of bar 295 visible in FEH emphasises that the note should not be played again in this place. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Inaccuracies in FE , Rhythmic errors , Accompaniment changes , Authentic corrections of FE , Annotations in FEH |