b. 293
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In A there are visible corrections and crossings-out in the R.H. part. Chopin tried a two-part notation there, probably the same as or similar to the one in b. 374. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A |
|||||
b. 293
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the sources there is no over the mark, which is a patent inaccuracy, certainly repeated after [A]. category imprint: Interpretations within context |
|||||
b. 293
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The additional trill in GE is most probably a mistake by the engraver, who placed a crotchet too early and either did not notice his mistake or forgot to remove the wrong mark. Anyways, the trill was absent in [A] – this bar was not written out in the manuscripts, but marked in an abridged manner as a repetition of b. 60, in which there is no trace of that trill. Moreover, there is no convincing evidence of Chopin proofreading GE1. Nevertheless, we have to admit that such a diversification of the last appearance of a repeated phrase would fit into the Chopinesque style. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 293-294
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Like in b. 60-61, in the main text we give the shorter slur of GE; however, the version of FE (→EE) may be considered equal. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 294
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |