mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 261

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Slur from 1st quaver in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

Slur from 2nd quaver in GE3
..

A later beginning of the slur in GE3 is an arbitrary revision, introduced most probably on the basis of the inaccurate beginning of the slur of GE in bar 263.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 261-264

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

2 lower slurs in FE (→EE)

No lower slurs in GE
..

The absence of the bottom slurs in GE most probably means that they were added by Chopin in the last proofreading of FE (→EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 261-263

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Flats b1 & b in FE (→GE,EE)

5 cautionary accidentals suggested by editors
..

In the entire three-bar chromatic sequence, in the main text we suggest a few cautionary accidentals in the R.H. part –  of g in b. 261,  of a1 in b. 262 and  of e1 and  of f1, g1 in b. 263. In turn, we omit the flats before b1 and b in b. 262 present in the sources.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Cautionary accidentals

b. 261

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

in GE

No marking in FE (→EE)
..

Chopin could have entered  into [A] after Fontana had finished [FC]. In this case it seems slightly more likely than a possible oversight of the mark by the copyist or the engraver of FE, since a similar situation concerns also  and  in b. 267-268 (however, such serial oversights would happen both to Fontana and the engravers – cf., e.g. the ending of the Prelude in B minor, Op. 28 No. 16 or the Prelude in E major, Op. 28 No. 19, b. 28-32). Anyways, there are no doubts as to the authenticity of this indication; as nothing indicates that Chopin would have wanted to forgo it, we give it in the main text.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 261-263

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

2 slurs in GE

No slurs in FE (→EE)
..

The absence of slurs in FE (→EE) must be considered an oversight of Chopin, Fontana or the engraver – slurs are present both in analogous b. 3-4 and later in the introduction, in b. 263-267.

category imprint: Differences between sources