



b. 190-191
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
Providing bar 191 with a separate slur can be an echo of the original slurring (cf., e.g., the slurs in bars 45-48). The notation of GC suggests that the slurs could have been combined by Chopin in [A], which was misunderstood in FE (→EE). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||
b. 190
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The omission of category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||
b. 190
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A there are no naturals raising d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Inaccuracies in A |
||||
b. 190
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
There are no doubts that the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents |
||||
b. 190-192
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, ending the slur on the last crotchet in bar 191 is an inaccuracy of the notation of A – cf. the longer slur in the L.H. as well as the slur over a similar phrase in bars 188-190. Starting the slur in GE1 (→FE→EE) only from bar 191 is an example of a characteristic manner of the engraver of GE1. See also bars 192-194. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |