mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 220

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

..

In FE1 (→FE2→FE3) the 1st note in the L.H. is an A. The mistake was corrected in FESch, EE and FE4, the correct G is also in GC (→GE).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE , Annotations in FESch

b. 220-222

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

No arpeggio signs in the sources

Arpeggio signs suggested by the editors
..

Chopin did not mark here the arpeggios of the tenth chords in the L.H. In spite of this, on the basis of a few signs appearing in analogous bars, we suggest an alternative notation with marked arpeggios.

category imprint: Interpretations within context

b. 220

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

No marking in GC (→GE)

in FE (→EE)
..

Same as in bar 32, the absence of  in GC (→GE) is probably an oversight of the copyist.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 220-222

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

No ties in the sources

Ties suggested by the editors
..

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions

b. 220-222

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

No ties in the sources

Ties suggested by the editors
..

Due to the reasons discussed for the slurs of the L.H., we suggest the version with the ties of c3 and c2.

category imprint: Editorial revisions