Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 219

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

 in A

 in GE (→FE)

 in EE

..

Similarly as in bars 217-218, we consider the subsequent shortenings of the  sign in GE (→FE) and EE to be accidental, hence in the main text we reproduce the notation of A.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies

b. 219

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

g1 in A (→GEFE1)

b1 in FE2 (→EE)

..

The version of A (→GEFE1), changed by Chopin in the proofreading of FE2 (→EE), was already a result of a correction in A – originally, the 7th quaver was most probably a c2. In the main text we give the latest of these three authentic versions.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Corrections in A , Authentic corrections of FE , Main-line changes

b. 219-220

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

 
 
 
 

Our variant suggestion

..

We suggest adding characteristic accents, in accordance with the notation in analogous bar 107. The marks were probably added by the revisers of GE and EE. In EE2 (→EE3), in addition, the last accent was arbitrarily changed to a vertical one.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 219

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

..

As in the case of analogous bar 107, in GE there is no  before a1, added most probably in the last proofreading of FE (→EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: FE revisions

b. 219-220

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

2 one-bar long slurs in A

Two-bar long slur in GE (→FEEE)

..

The two-bar slur, present in GE (→FEEE), does not bear traces of corrections in print; therefore, we assume that it was an arbitrary decision of the engraver of GE1. However, taking into consideration the fact that the slur does not distort the phrasing in this place at all, and Chopin's possible proofreading cannot be entirely excluded, we regard this version as an equal variant to two slurs of A.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE