mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 163

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

in FE (→GE,EE)

suggested by the editors
..

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 163

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

e2 tied in A (→GE) & EE

e2 repeated in FE
..

The missing tie of e2 in FE is certainly a mistake, corrected in EE, most probably on the basis of comparison with analogous bars.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE

b. 163-164

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Slur up to bar 164 in FE (→GE) 

No slur in EE1

Slur only in bar 163 in EE3
..

Leading the L.H. slur until the beginning of bar 164 is much less justified than in the case of the R.H. slur due to the over two-octave f1-E leap. Therefore, it is quite likely that it is the slur added in EE3 that corresponds to Chopin's intention – the engraver of FE could have been under the influence of the R.H. slur while interpreting the slur of [A], perhaps written with a flourish.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE

b. 163

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

We add a cautionary  next to d2. The accidental was added also in GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions

b. 163

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Slurs in FE (→GE1→GE2)

Slurs in EE & GE3
..

We include the added and corrected slurs of EE and GE3 in the main text.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions