![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
b. 220-225
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
We consider the missing pedalling in FE (→GE,EE) in bars 220-225 to be an inaccuracy of notation, even though it was probably omitted by Chopin himself. We suggest adding markings patterned after the analogous bars 52-54, 231 and 56-57 (we include markings from bar 231 instead of the most probably inaccurate pedalling of bar 55). category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 220
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
FEH includes here two diagonal crosses – characteristic marks of Chopinesque teaching. Each time, their meaning remains in the sphere of more or less justified speculation. category imprint: Source & stylistic information |
|||||
b. 220
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Just like in b. 76, the dyad of the bottom voice (e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
|||||
b. 220
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The version of GE, although harmonically possible, must be a mistake. It is proven by the version of FE (→EE), compliant with the incontestable text of analogous b. 76. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 220-221
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In [A], there was neither category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |