



b. 127
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In AsI, there are 2 versions of this bar – the 1st volta, slightly different from the 2nd volta of b. 111, with a repeat sign at the end, and the 2nd volta, generally compliant with the final text. The repetition of b. 112-127 was initially also present in A, in which, however, Chopin removed it by deleting the bar creating the 1st volta of b. 127 and erasing the 2nd volta marking over the bar containing the ending of the solo part. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Changed phrase length |
||||||||
b. 127
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The full B category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Accompaniment changes |
||||||||
b. 127
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 127-129
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
The three-note chords present in FE (→EE) are much more likely here, since they prepare and open the chordal sequence in bars 129-132. The FC version almost certainly resulted from the copyist's carelessness, who did not take care of the visibility of the notes written on the ledger line. This is indicated by the notation of the first two chords in bar 129, in which it is also the e1 notes that are practically imperceptible, although their presence is unquestionable. In GE1 it was also c category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Uncertain notes on ledger lines , Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 127
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The missing accent in FE (→EE1) could be blamed on the copyist's oversight, since the mark written on the stave is poorly visible in A. Nevertheless, since in bar 135, in a similar context, the visible A accent is also absent in FE, it is more likely that both marks were added to A after the basis for FE, that is [FC], had been finished. GE reproducing the accent as short is a frequent inaccuracy concerning long accents. The short EE2 accent was repeated after GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE |