b. 163
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
The d1 in RH by mistake is a dotted crotchet in FC3 (→FE→IE) and EE. We present the A and GE versions that raise no doubts. In RH we add cautionary before d1. A similar addition was introduced in EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 163
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 163
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 163
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The missing tie of e2 in FE is certainly a mistake, corrected in EE, most probably on the basis of comparison with analogous bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
||||||||
b. 163-164
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
Leading the L.H. slur until the beginning of bar 164 is much less justified than in the case of the R.H. slur due to the over two-octave f1-E leap. Therefore, it is quite likely that it is the slur added in EE3 that corresponds to Chopin's intention – the engraver of FE could have been under the influence of the R.H. slur while interpreting the slur of [A], perhaps written with a flourish. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |